NOVA Scam report against @NGOnfire 200$ + 16$ account

[pollymydolly]

08-12-2025, 03:28 AM NGOnfire Wrote:

07-12-2025, 10:20 PM beastmode Wrote:

@NGOnfire,

I have thoroughly reviewed all evidence provided here, on the other forum, and the supplemental logs sent via telegram. The investigation is now concluded. Here are the findings:


1. "Stolen/Hacked Card" Allegations Dismissed Your claims that the seller is using "stolen hacked and cr@cked accounts" or "hacked c@rds" are false. @pollymydolly has provided sufficient proof via telegram, including real-time access to the banking application and invoices matching the forum timestamps. We have verified that the payment methods legally belong to the seller. This defense is invalid.


2. Lying to Staff & Contradictory Statements This is the most critical violation.

Initial Statement: You explicitly stated, "I did not make any purchase from this seller" and "I never bought anything from this retard".
Later Admission: You contradicted yourself by admitting, "ChatGPT PRO account was bought on November 08 2025... It stopped working on November 25".

Attempting to deceive the administration by denying a transaction that actually took place is a severe offense. This completely destroys your credibility regarding how the account was actually "banned" or "deleted."


3. Malicious Intent Given that you are a competitor in the same niche and you lied about the transaction history, it is the decision of the administration that you are responsible for the destruction of the account. It is highly probable that the account was sabotaged (deleted from settings) rather than banned organically, as claimed by the seller.


DECISION:

@NGOnfire, you are found guilty of scamming and attempting to deceive the staff.

Total Owed: $216 (The value of the destroyed asset + the bluff fee retained).

Deadline: You have 24 hours to refund the seller in full.

Failure to complete this refund within the timeframe will result in a Permanent Ban across the forum for Scamming and Lying to Staff.

@pollymydolly, please update this thread immediately once the payment is received.

1. I will refund in full if you show me proof that I'm guilty of scamming. I did not scam @pollymydolly. I'm asking him, you and all other Forum Moderators and Staff here on Patched.sh for proof that I was the one who logged into his account and then deleted the account. Why is that proof still not shared here after so many days of creating the Scam Report. He resold the same account to multiple people across the world and there can be so many other Customers who could have attempted to close it / delete it or cancel the Subscription. Where is the proof that shows that I logged in to the account and caused the closure of the account?

Even if we assume in the worse case that I was indeed the one who closed his account, why can't he contact OpenAI, show them the payment receipt of 200$ that he paid for the PRO Subscription and re-claim his own Subscription back? Is it because OpenAI can respond to him stating that the account was being accessed from multiple locations all across the world and from different IP's that OpenAI felt suspicious about the account and caused the closure of the account, which is the actual truth?

2. I did not attempt or deceive administration. I wrote in passive voice stating that 'ChatGPT PRO account was bought on November 08 2025' which means a Client of mine purchased GPT PRO and I paid money to @pollymydolly so I could send login details to him. I sent all TOS including his illegal TOS which states '2FA will be given only once and a second time if the devices logs out 2FA won't be given'. Still after a few days of using the account, the account got logged out. My Client wanted to access the account again, he couldn't. I could have been a little more clear in my statement which may have confused the Moderators for which I'm sorry.

@pollymydolly lie in his own statement saying after I logged in to your account, it was banned after 5 minutes, so I banned it.
But 25$ for 1 month of GPT PRO was paid on November 8, 2025 and it was being used as per your TOS until November 25, 2025, roughly for 16-17 days.
So if my Client logged into his account and immediately and magically 'caused the ban' on your account within 5 minutes, how come it worked for 17 days?
The Warranty was not honored for the month, when the account worked for roughly 17 days, hence the part refund of 16$ was fair.

It only logged out because @pollymydolly kept re-selling the same account to so many other Customers and OpenAI got suspicious and closed the account. 

3. I never attempted to even login to his account, access or destroy it. This is the fact. Let your judgement be fair and not based on contrasting evidences.
It is after reading your reply beastmode that I realise that not all Moderators / Staff could be Lucas (I miss him really). 

If @pollymydolly pays 200$ for an account, re-sells the same account to multiple users and OpenAI decides to close the account due to suspicious activity, how am I being held responsible for closure of the account? 

beastmode  I' think your decision to ask me to pay this Seller is not fair or wise, it would pave way for multiple sellers to scam Customers this way lying about reselling their account to multiple Customers and randomly accusing a Customer and asking them to pay, when the actual problem is violation of TOS of a personal account being resold to so many Customers around the world.

beastmode IF you have the proof, send me on DM's that @pollymydolly sent you, about me being the one, who logged into his account and then sabotaging the account and closing it. You cannot make a decision without this proof. 

I submitted all the evidence. You're still saying the evidence is insufficient. If what I submitted was insufficient or incorrect, the administrators wouldn't have made such a decision.
 
beastmode provided a good explanation and made a decision. I thank him for carefully reviewing such a long case.
 
 
Deadline: You have 24 hours to refund the seller in full.
 
Failure to complete this refund within the timeframe will result in a Permanent Ban across the forum for Scamming and Lying to Staff.
 
There are 8 hours left until the deadline. If you don't make the refund, you will be banned. Send my money to the address I specified. I'm waiting for you.

[beastmode]

@NGOnfire & @pollymydolly,

Due to the complexity of this dispute and the conflicting claims, this case has undergone a secondary technical review regarding forum policies on "Damage Claims" and the specific Terms of Service (ToS) involved.

Based on this review, the previous assessment has been revised to strictly adhere to the forum's liability standards. Here is the binding resolution:

1. Financial Claim ($216 Refund): DENIED The request for a refund (covering the account value and verification funds) is rejected based on the following technical grounds:

Damage Claim Policy: This dispute constitutes a "damage claim," which deal disputes do not cover. The buyer paid for access to the account, not an insured or guaranteed outcome. The subsequent loss of access is a consequential event rather than a covered deal defect.

Advisory vs. Binding ToS: The Seller’s terms do not prohibit actions on the account, such as updating credentials; they only recommend against changes, which is advisory language and not contractually binding.

Inherent Risk: The product is a "Shared Account" subject to frequent suspicious activity warnings and temporary access restrictions—these are inherent risks explicitly stated in the Seller’s business model. Termination or restricted access is therefore an expected risk and does not justify a dispute or refund.

2. Conduct Violation: Misleading Staff (ACTION TAKEN) While @NGOnfire is cleared of financial liability regarding the asset, his conduct during this investigation was unacceptable.


Violation: In your initial response, you explicitly stated "I never bought anything from this Seller". This lack of transparency and misleading information obstructed the investigation and wasted administrative time.

Penalty: Consequently, @NGOnfire will receive a 1-Month "Deal With Caution" (DWC) status on their profile. Honesty is mandatory in Deal Disputes, regardless of the financial outcome.

FINAL SUMMARY:

Financial: No refunds are awarded. The claim is dismissed as a damage claim not covered by dispute policies.

Administrative: @NGOnfire is issued a 1-Month DWC for lying/missinfo to staff.

Case Closed.