DIAMOND Scam report against | @syn0 | $650

[beastmode]

Based on the private chat logs, the agreement was clearly $650 for 21 days of downtime, explicitly confirmed by both parties. The seller also confirmed that the service should remain effective even if the target changes servers.

The seller stated before payment that additional protections might require extra cost. However, the seller never stated that:

refunds would not be issued if such extra payment was not made, nor
the buyer would be limited to alternative services instead of a refund.

The same logs also include a bypass guarantee, and the condition that this guarantee would only apply with additional payment was not clearly defined or mutually agreed upon at the time of the agreement.
The chat logs further show that the service was significantly delayed and that even during the initially referenced period, the service was not delivered in the guaranteed manner, as stable downtime was not maintained.

The seller has since stated that the service will not continue without extra payment. The buyer is not requesting any additional or alternative service, and is reasonably requesting either fulfillment of the original agreement or a refund for the undelivered time.

Operational costs such as proxies or infrastructure were not agreed upon as buyer-paid expenses and cannot be used to justify refusing a refund.

This case is classified as failed service delivery.
The seller is required to refund the undelivered portion (19/21 days).
Failure to comply may result in the scam report being upheld and further staff action.

[syn0]

the agreement "i can guarantee i can bypass anything" was in refrence with the reminder that extra bypasses whould cost and an refund obligation was never stated or agreed to  by me or the buyer just taking this as a scam solely because of the absence of an written "no refunds" is a flawed conclusion just because it wasn't stated by any of the parties it dosen't mean its refund guaranteed

[beastmode]

@syn0 Refund is the default outcome for undelivered services, no-refund must be explicitly stated to apply. You have 24 hours to issue refund.

[syn0]

i have stated it clearly to him before he paid that getting trough some protections might cost now he is mad im charing extra you have to understand me beastmode i cant just work 8h + solving their custom captcha and paying money out of my pocket for resources  to give him downtime i have clearly stated that the 650$ is not an fixed price and extra charges might occur yes its right we haven't spoke about refunds if service not complete etc but it dosen't mean this means its a guaranteed refund

[beastmode]

@syn0 You stating that extra protections may require additional payment does not remove the obligation to refund undelivered service time.

Operational costs, time spent, or resources used are the seller’s responsibility unless explicitly agreed as buyer-paid expenses.

The agreement was $650 for 21 days of downtime, and this amount was accepted.
If the service cannot be completed under the agreed terms and you are unwilling to continue without extra payment, the service is considered not delivered.

Refunds do not need to be guaranteed in advance.
A no-refund policy must be explicitly stated to apply. This was not done.

You are required to refund the undelivered portion.
You have 24 hours to comply.

[syn0]

The deal was for 21 days down. Before I got paid, I warned that extra protections might cost extra.
The buyer paid, but then the target added major new security that my original method couldn't beat. This is an "extra bypass"  exactly what I warned would cost more.
I didn't stop the job. I offered to finish it with the new bypass needed. The buyer refused to pay the extra cost and now wants a refund.
He's ending the deal, not me. I'm ready to complete the 21 days if he covers the new work required. No refund is owed because I didn't fail  the conditions changed, and he won't pay to adapt.
You can't expect a $650 price to beat every upgrade the target makes later. That's why I said "some bypasses might cost" upfront.

[ogr]

13-12-2025, 01:36 PM syn0 Wrote:

The deal was for 21 days down. Before I got paid, I warned that extra protections might cost extra.
The buyer paid, but then the target added major new security that my original method couldn't beat. This is an "extra bypass"  exactly what I warned would cost more.
I didn't stop the job. I offered to finish it with the new bypass needed. The buyer refused to pay the extra cost and now wants a refund.
He's ending the deal, not me. I'm ready to complete the 21 days if he covers the new work required. No refund is owed because I didn't fail  the conditions changed, and he won't pay to adapt.
You can't expect a $650 price to beat every upgrade the target makes later. That's why I said "some bypasses might cost" upfront.

shut up kid, send the money back. 

23 hrs left  

[ogr]

As I said before the kid refuses to refund. Just a poor prick with 0 $ .


Ready to ruin his rep for 582 bucks fucking poor twat.

[syn0]

13-12-2025, 04:50 PM ogr Wrote:

As I said before the kid refuses to refund. Just a poor prick with 0 $ .


Ready to ruin his rep for 582 bucks fucking poor twat.

i have much more than 0$ trust me  :)  i was falsely classified  i provided the service he just got mad that i charged him extra to get trough some protections

[ogr]

13-12-2025, 05:40 PM syn0 Wrote:

13-12-2025, 04:50 PM ogr Wrote:

As I said before the kid refuses to refund. Just a poor prick with 0 $ .


Ready to ruin his rep for 582 bucks fucking poor twat.

i have much more than 0$ trust me  :)  i was falsely classified  i provided the service he just got mad that i charged him extra to get trough some protections

Then refund the payment , or you got left I think 12 hours till ban lol